articleIcon-icon

Article

7 min read

MFA vs 2FA: Key Differences Explained

IT & device management

Image

Author

Michał Kowalewski

Last Update

November 14, 2025

blog hero illustration globe workflows
Table of Contents

What is multi-factor authentication (MFA)?

What is two-factor authentication (2FA)?

Key differences between MFA and 2FA

When to use 2FA vs MFA

The global workforce factor

Implementing authentication for distributed teams

How Deel IT supports authentication security

Key takeaways

  1. All 2FA is MFA, but not all MFA is 2FA. Two-factor authentication always uses exactly two factors, while multi-factor authentication can adapt from two to multiple factors based on risk and context, making MFA more flexible for distributed teams.
  2. Security strength depends on authentication methods, not quantity - 2FA with strong methods (password + security key) beats weak MFA implementations.
  3. Deel IT strengthens authentication through secure device foundations: devices arrive globally with MDM enrollment, security software, and proper encryption already configured, enabling authentication systems to verify device security posture and make smarter access decisions across distributed workforces.

When your finance manager in Singapore logs in at midnight or a contractor in Berlin needs access on day one, authentication determines whether they get in smoothly or get locked out. For global teams, choosing between multi-factor authentication (MFA) and two-factor authentication (2FA) shapes both security and operations.

What is multi-factor authentication (MFA)?

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) requires people to verify their identity using two or more different pieces of evidence before accessing a system. Instead of relying solely on a username and password, users must provide additional forms of authentication.

Think of it like a bank vault with multiple locks. You need a key, a combination, and a fingerprint scan. Each lock creates layers of security.

Types of authentication factors

Multi-factor authentication MFA draws from three main categories when requiring users to gain access to systems:

  • Knowledge factor (something you know). Passwords, PINs, or security questions. Information only you should know.
  • Possession factor (something you have). Mobile devices, a security key, or an employee badge. Physical objects that verify your identity.
  • Inherence factor (something you are). Fingerprints, face recognition, or voice patterns. Biological characteristics unique to you.

Modern MFA also considers context: where you're logging in from, what device you're using, and whether behavior matches normal patterns. An employee on their registered office laptop might need just username and password plus fingerprint. The same person from an unknown device in a different country faces additional security measures.

How MFA adapts to risk

Unlike single factor authentication (which relies only on passwords), the smartest MFA systems evaluate risk continuously. When risk is low (known device, familiar location), authentication stays simple. When risk increases (new device, unusual location), the system demands stronger proof.

See also: Authentication Methods: Types, Factors, and Protocols Explained

Identity Access Management
Seamlessly provision device and app access for global teams
Provision and manage access with ease. Deel IT syncs with your identity provider to automatically update device and app access based on role changes—so you can onboard faster, stay compliant, and secure assets across your global team.
Banner asset_Deel IT Identity Access Management

What is two-factor authentication (2FA)?

Two-factor authentication (2FA) is a specific type of multi-factor authentication that requires exactly two different authentication methods. Most commonly: username and password, then one additional piece of proof.

The familiar example: you enter your password, the system sends a text message with a six-digit code to your phone, you type it in. Two pieces of evidence, two steps.

Common 2FA methods

Organizations use several authentication methods for the second verification step:

  • SMS codes via text message. A temporary one time password (OTP) sent to your registered phone after entering your password.
  • Authenticator app. Mobile apps like Google Authenticator generate time-based codes that change every 30 seconds, providing a possession factor without cellular service.
  • Email verification. A confirmation code sent to your registered email as an additional authentication layer.
  • Push notifications. You approve the login from your mobile devices with a single tap, confirming possession of the registered device.
  • Hardware security key. Physical devices that generate authentication codes, offering strong protection against phishing.

The key limitation: 2FA always uses exactly two factors, regardless of context. Your desk at 9 AM or an airport at 3 AM gets identical treatment.

Key differences between MFA and 2FA

While these terms are often used interchangeably, understanding their differences helps you choose the right approach. Here's the crucial distinction: all 2FA is technically MFA, but not all MFA is 2FA. Every two-factor system is a form of multi-factor authentication, but MFA can require three, four, or more factors.

Quick comparison table

Feature 2FA MFA
Number of factors Always exactly two Two or more (varies by risk)
Flexibility Fixed requirements every time Adapts based on context
Common methods Password + SMS/app code Any combination of knowledge, possession, inherence factors
User experience Predictable but rigid Adjusts to situation
Best for Small teams, fixed locations Distributed teams, high-risk data
Security strength Strong with good methods Depends on methods chosen

See also: Authentication vs Authorization: Understand the Difference

Number of verification steps

2FA uses exactly two factors every time. MFA uses two or more, and the number can change based on risk. A low-risk login might need two factors, while a high-risk attempt requires four.

Flexibility

2FA applies the same requirements to every login. MFA adapts, evaluating context (device, location, behavior) and adjusting requirements accordingly.

This matters for global teams. Fixed 2FA treats an employee's laptop at home the same as an unknown device in an unfamiliar country. Adaptive MFA distinguishes between these scenarios.

Security strength

Here's where it gets interesting: MFA isn't automatically more secure than 2FA. Protection depends on which authentication methods you use, not just how many layers of security you add.

Two-factor authentication using username and password plus a security key is more secure than 2FA that uses a password plus SMS. Why? Because security keys are extremely difficult to compromise, while text message codes can be intercepted.

Microsoft reports that MFA blocks over 99.9% of account compromise attacks, but this protection depends on using strong authentication methods. Stacking weak methods doesn't automatically create strong security.

User experience and cost considerations

2FA creates predictable experiences but can frustrate users when circumstances change. MFA balances convenience with security more intelligently, though 67% of IT professionals agree that additional security measures create more cumbersome experiences.

Cost-wise, 2FA requires simpler setup and lower investment. MFA demands more sophisticated systems and careful configuration, requiring more IT expertise and higher investment.

When to use 2FA vs MFA

Choosing between these authentication methods isn't about which is "better" in absolute terms. It's about matching the approach to your organization's specific needs and operational reality.

2FA works when:

  • Your team primarily works from fixed locations with company devices. When most access happens from predictable contexts, 2FA's simplicity becomes an advantage.
  • Your organization handles routine data without strict regulatory requirements. 2FA provides meaningful security improvement over single factor authentication for standard business operations.
  • You have limited IT resources and budget. Strong 2FA with good authentication methods (password plus hardware keys or biometric verification) offers substantial protection without complex configuration.

MFA is necessary when:

  • Your workforce is distributed across multiple countries. When employees work from dozens of locations, use various devices, and log in across time zones, you need authentication that distinguishes legitimate global access from threats.
  • You handle sensitive information subject to regulatory requirements. PCI DSS 4.0 requires MFA for all access to payment transaction data from 2025. Healthcare organizations need MFA for HIPAA compliance.
  • You've experienced security incidents or face elevated risk. IBM estimates the average data breach costs $4.88 million, a 10% increase from the previous year. Organizations that understand these costs invest in stronger authentication.

The global workforce factor

Here's what most authentication guides miss: distributed teams break traditional 2FA assumptions. When your workforce spans multiple countries and time zones, authentication challenges multiply in ways that fixed two-factor systems weren't designed to handle.

Why traditional 2FA struggles globally

Two-factor authentication assumes consistent access patterns. But global teams don't have consistent patterns. Your developer in Poland works different hours than your designer in Mexico. Your sales team travels constantly. Contractors log in from coworking spaces worldwide.

Fixed 2FA can't distinguish between legitimate complexity and actual threats. An employee traveling for work triggers the same authentication as an attacker using stolen credentials from a different country. Both look "unusual" to systems that can't understand context.

How adaptive MFA solves global authentication challenges

MFA that incorporates location behavior, device trust, and access patterns can tell the difference. It recognizes that your employee logs in from new countries but always from their registered laptop with updated security software. It knows their typical working hours even as they move through time zones.

This context awareness prevents two problems: locking out legitimate employees who work globally, and missing actual security threats that hide among complex access patterns.

See also: How To Create a Secure IT Environment For Hybrid Teams: A Complete Guide

Case study

By switching to Deel IT’s global-first solution, Directional Pizza, the largest Pizza Hut franchise in the UK, can now hire across borders and seamlessly equip employees with the tech they need, wherever they are. IT assets are now procured, deployed, and managed across all countries from a single platform.

Implementing authentication for distributed teams

Whether you choose 2FA or MFA, implementation determines whether your strategy works. Here are key principles for global workforces.

See also: 11 Best Identity and Access Management Tools for Distributed Teams

Start with device security

Authentication works better when combined with device management. Verify that employees access systems from secured, company-managed devices with proper encryption and updated security software.

Use phishing-resistant methods

SMS codes can be intercepted. Passwords can be stolen. Federal agencies must use only phishing-resistant authentication by 2024. Phishing-resistant methods like FIDO2 security keys use cryptographic techniques that make credential theft functionally impossible.

Plan for the entire lifecycle

Authentication extends beyond login. When employees leave, access must be revoked immediately. When devices are returned, credentials must be properly cleared. Your strategy should account for the full employee and device lifecycle.

You would hear me complaining daily about our equipment issues with our previous provider. With Deel IT, this simply stopped.

Claudia Korenko,

People Ops Manager at Sastrify

How Deel IT supports authentication security

Deel IT handles the device and access management foundation that makes authentication more effective. Devices reach employees worldwide already configured with security software, MDM enrollment, and proper encryption. When authentication systems can verify device security posture, they make smarter access decisions.

When employees need access revoked, it happens immediately from a central dashboard. When devices are returned, they undergo certified data erasure. This coordinated approach prevents gaps that can undermine authentication controls.

With 24/7 global support across 130+ countries, authentication issues get resolved regardless of time zone. Security doesn't have to come at the cost of productivity.

Book a demo to see how Deel IT supports secure authentication strategies for distributed workforces.

Deel IT
Automate IT operations in 130+ countries
Simplify equipment lifecycle management with Deel IT—procure, deploy, repair, and recover devices all in one place with 24/7 support.
Image

Michał Kowalewski a writer and content manager with 7+ years of experience in digital marketing. He spent most of his professional career working in startups and tech industry. He's a big proponent of remote work considering it not just a professional preference but a lifestyle that enhances productivity and fosters a flexible work environment. He enjoys tackling topics of venture capital, equity, and startup finance.