How to Implement Pay Transparency in Your Organization: A Practical Playbook

Salary transparency supports:

• Pay equity (reduces unexplained differences)
• Fairer negotiation (especially for underrepresented groups)
• Faster hiring (candidates self-select based on fit)
• Stronger retention (less resentment over hidden pay gaps)

Pay transparency also puts HR in a position of proactive control rather than reactive defense.

Full pay transparency means disclosing:

• All salary bands (often internally)
• Actual salaries (sometimes public)
• Pay criteria used in decisions
• Progress on equity goals (like closing gender gaps)

Full pay transparency is quite rare and often linked to progressive employer branding.

Buffer offers a great example of full pay transparency, with all salaries being publicly available. They are also transparent with the way compensation decisions happen, and their Open Salary System, introduced in 2024, which covers three elements:

• Market data: Market data of salaries in tech for our company size, from which Buffer derives salaries
• Buffer benchmarks: A grid of every role at Buffer with every level within that role. The grid provides a single view of how salaries progress for each role at Buffer
• Buffer salaries: The salaries for everyone in the team and the calculations to arrive at each salary.

The EU Pay Transparency Directive is a new regulation requiring companies to share clear information about salary ranges, pay structures, and pay gaps. It includes:

• Disclosing salary ranges in job ads
• Giving employees access to pay criteria
• Requiring reporting on gender pay gaps
• Banning pay secrecy clauses

It applies to companies operating in the EU, even non-EU companies with a significant EU presence—over 100 employees living in EU member states—and aims to promote pay equity.

EU member states are expected to translate the Directive’s provisions into national legislation by June 2026.

Yes, and increasingly, they must do so according to regulations. Posting salary ranges:

• Builds trust with candidates
• Reduces negotiation bias
• Saves time screening mismatched applicants
• Is legally required in a growing number of jurisdictions (e.g., New York, Colorado, California, British Columbia in Canada)

If you’re hiring in multiple countries or states, it’s safer to default to transparency rather than manage patchwork compliance.

A simple, compliant policy might include:

• All job postings include a base salary range
• Pay decisions are based on defined criteria (experience, scope, geography)
• Employees may request their pay range and the criteria used
• HR conducts annual pay equity audits

Such pay transparency policy sets expectations and protects against ad hoc decisions.

Yes, two employees doing the same job can be paid differently, but only under justifiable, documented reasons. Such reasons include:

• Differences in experience, education, or performance
• Location-based cost-of-living adjustments (if consistent)

Without a clear rationale, differences in pay for the same role can raise pay discrimination concerns, especially under transparency laws or internal audits.

Pay discrimination happens when two employees doing substantially similar work are paid differently based on gender, race, age, or other protected characteristics without valid, performance-based, or business-justified reasons.

Transparency makes this risk more visible and legally actionable.

Some key steps to prepare for pay transparency include:

1. Audit current pay ranges and actual salaries
2. Document pay criteria and job leveling
3. Identify unexplained pay gaps
4. Align leadership and train managers
5. Build a framework for publishing or sharing salary ranges

We recommend starting with internal visibility before going public.

To communicate pay transparency to employees, it’s critical to prioritize clarity and structure. Elements you must cover include:

• What pay transparency means at your company
• What employees can access or expect
• How salaries are set and reviewed
• Where to go with questions

Use onboarding, handbooks, and manager training to reinforce it.

Several states and several cities (like NYC) have pay transparency requirements, including:

• Colorado
• California
• Washington
• New York
• Illinois
• Nevada
• Maryland
• Connecticut
• Rhode Island
• Hawaii
• Maryland
• Minnesota
• Vermont
• Washington

Each has different rules (e.g., range posting, wage disclosure, salary history bans), so multi-state employers need to stay informed.

Several other jurisdictions have proposed pay transparency laws similar to these. They include West Virginia, Washington, D.C., Virginia, South Dakota, Oregon, Montana, Missouri, Michigan, Maine, Kentucky, and Alaska.

Pay transparency can bring major benefits such as equity and trust. Still, it also raises real privacy and workplace culture risks that need thoughtful handling.

Top privacy concerns include:

• Employees feeling exposed or judged: Not everyone wants their salary known, even internally. Publicizing individual pay without consent can cause resentment or embarrassment, especially if it exposes legacy discrepancies.
• Misinterpretation of pay gaps: People may assume discrimination or favoritism without the full context (e.g., differences in tenure, experience, or geography). Even justified differences can look unfair without explanation.
• Manager vulnerability: Pay transparency can expose inconsistent past decisions or unclear criteria. Managers may struggle to explain differences they didn’t originally oversee or document.
• Global complexity: Pay structures vary widely in multi-country companies. Revealing pay across regions without local context could lead to confusion or misalignment.

Clear, contextual communication helps, as does pairing transparency with job leveling and rationale. Additionally, In some countries, salary is considered personal data. Always check local rules before sharing individual figures.